Five Stories That Matter in Michigan This Week – September 20, 2024

  1. Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Wage Ruling

The Michigan Supreme Court released an order following Attorney General Dana Nessel’s recent request for clarification from the Court on certain issues, including a precise start date for calculating inflations, related to the Court’s recent “adopt and amend” minimum wage and sick leave ruling in the case of Mothering Justice v Attorney General.

Why it Matters: Per the Court’s ruling, increases to the state’s minimum wage and tipped wage laws, and the expansion of the state’s earned sick time laws, will go into effect February 21, 2025. The Court’s order clarified the tipped minimum wage and date of annual increases, as well as specified new minimum wage rates. You can find the order here.

———

  1. Michigan Cannabis Sales Grow Despite Ohio Starting Recreational Sales

According to the Detroit Free Press, Ohio cannabis dispensaries sold nearly $55 million in recreational cannabis in August—the state’s first month of legal recreational sales. Michigan recreational sales increased 3% month over month, and 9% year over year, in August.

Why it Matters: There has been quite a bit of speculation about what impact Ohio’s recreational sales would have on Michigan’s cannabis marketplace. So far, Michigan seems to be continuing its growth trajectory.

———

  1. Michigan Cannabis Exceeds $295 Million in August ‘24

Cannabis sales surpassed $295 million in August, via the monthly report from the Michigan Cannabis Regulatory Agency. Michigan adult-use sales came in at $294,151,545.18, while medical sales came in at $1,260,707.52, totaling $295,412,252.70.

Why it Matters: While the prices of cannabis and cannabis-related products continue to decrease and make consumers happy, growers on the other hand are seeing profits decrease resulting in them seeking ways to halt new licenses to be granted in an effort to steady prices.

———

  1. Business Education Series: Avoid the Five Business Dangers

On Wednesday, October 30, Tom Hamp, Hamp Business Coaching, will delve into the critical issues of poor leadership skills and their impact on organizational success, explore strategies to overcome underperforming sales, and discuss the consequences of ineffective marketing. Additionally, we will examine the importance of robust human capital management and the detrimental effects of financial mismanagement. This seminar is designed to provide practical solutions and actionable insights to help you navigate and resolve these common business problems effectively.

Why it Matters: Learn how to understand your business’s financials, understand profit and loss and use it to your advantage. Also learn how leadership impacts staff and how to manage employees better by increasing leadership skills. Full information and to register.

———

  1. Intellectual Property and Rebranding: What Business Leaders Need to Know

Rebranding a business is exciting. It’s often done at a time of growth and transformation, such as a merger or acquisition, when a business is launching an important new product, entering a new geographic market, or trying to appeal to a new customer demographic. Whether you’re updating your logo, changing your company name, or overhauling your entire brand identity, it’s a big step that can lead to great opportunities.

Why it Matters: But before you dive into the creative process, it is crucial to consider the intellectual property (IP) law implications of a rebrand. Your brand is one of your most valuable assets, and rebranding involves important legal considerations that can impact your business’s future. In this article, we’ll walk you through some key IP issues you need to consider when rebranding. These considerations will help you protect your new identity and avoid costly legal pitfalls along the way. Read more.

Related Practice Groups and Professionals 

Labor, Employment & Civil Rights | David Houston
Cannabis Law | Sean Gallagher
Intellectual Property | Andrew Martin

Five Stories That Matter in Michigan This Week – September 13, 2024

  1. AG Nessel Asks Michigan Supreme Court to Clarify Minimum Wage Ruling

Attorney General Dana Nessel recently sought clarification from the Michigan Supreme Court as to certain issues, including a precise start date for calculating inflations, related to the Court’s recent “adopt and amend” minimum wage and sick leave ruling in the case of Mothering Justice v Attorney General.

Why it Matters: Per the Court’s ruling, increases to the state’s minimum wage and tipped wage laws, and the expansion of the state’s earned sick time laws, will go into effect February 21, 2025. With many businesses scrambling to prepare for the impact, the Court may provide some helpful clarity to those businesses as well as the state in administering and enforcing the law.

———

  1. Attorney Douglas J. Austin Honored as “Lawyer of the Year” in Real Estate Law in Lansing

Fraser Trebilcock attorney Douglas J. Austin has been named the Best Lawyers in America® 2025 Real Estate Law “Lawyer of the Year” in Lansing. “I am honored to be recognized by Best Lawyers® as a 2025 ‘Lawyer of the Year’ for Real Estate Law in Lansing,” said Mr. Austin.

Why it Matters: This is a high distinction, as only one attorney in each practice area in each community is identified as “Lawyer of the Year.” Mr. Austin has been at the center of real estate law for over 45 years. In addition to being a shareholder at Fraser Trebilcock, he is also the past chair of the firm’s Real Estate Law department.

———

  1. Michigan CRA Publishes August ’24 Data: Average Price Increases

Per data released by the Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA), the average retail price for adult-use sale of an ounce of cannabis in August was $80.14, a minor increase from $79.70 in July. This is a decrease from August 2023, where the average price was $94.16.

Why it Matters: While the prices of cannabis and cannabis-related products continue to decrease and make consumers happy, growers on the other hand are seeing profits decrease resulting in them seeking ways to halt new licenses to be granted in an effort to steady prices.

———

  1. Intellectual Property and Rebranding: What Business Leaders Need to Know

Rebranding a business is exciting. It’s often done at a time of growth and transformation, such as a merger or acquisition, when a business is launching an important new product, entering a new geographic market, or trying to appeal to a new customer demographic. Whether you’re updating your logo, changing your company name, or overhauling your entire brand identity, it’s a big step that can lead to great opportunities.

Why it Matters: But before you dive into the creative process, it is crucial to consider the intellectual property (IP) law implications of a rebrand. Your brand is one of your most valuable assets, and rebranding involves important legal considerations that can impact your business’s future. In this article, we’ll walk you through some key IP issues you need to consider when rebranding. These considerations will help you protect your new identity and avoid costly legal pitfalls along the way. Read more.

———

  1. Fraser Trebilcock Lawyers Selected Among “The Best Lawyers in America©” 2025 Edition in Lansing

Fraser Trebilcock is proud to announce that 12 attorneys from the firm have been selected for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America© 2025 edition in Lansing. Those selected include: Michael S. Ashton, Administrative / Regulatory Law; Litigation – Regulatory Enforcement (SEC, Telecom, Energy); Utilities Law; Douglas J. Austin, Real Estate Law; Michael E. Cavanaugh, Administrative / Regulatory Law; Bet-the-Company Litigation; Commercial Litigation; Litigation – Labor and Employment; Michael P. Donnelly, Commercial Litigation; Sean P. Gallagher, Environmental Law; Litigation – Environmental; Jennifer Utter Heston, Administrative / Regulatory Law; Mark E. Kellogg, Closely Held Companies and Family Business Law; Corporate Law; Hon. Paula J. Manderfield (Ret.), Mediation; Thaddeus E. Morgan, Commercial Litigation; Litigation – Construction; Michael H. Perry, Environmental Law; Gary C. Rogers, Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law; Litigation – Insurance; and Marlaine C. Teahan, Trusts and Estates.

Why it Matters: “These twelve attorneys are proven leaders in their field, and practice at a very high level. We congratulate them on this recognition by  Best Lawyers®,” said Thaddeus E. Morgan, President of Fraser Trebilcock. Read more.

Related Practice Groups and Professionals

Labor, Employment & Civil Rights | David Houston
Real Estate Law | Doug Austin
Cannabis Law | Sean Gallagher
Intellectual Property | Andrew Martin

Five Stories That Matter in Michigan This Week – September 6, 2024

  1. Michigan “Homeowner’s Energy Policy Act” Signed Into Law

Earlier this summer, the Michigan legislature passed and Governor Whitmer signed into law, the “Homeowner’s Energy Policy Act,” which will prohibit homeowners’ associations from banning certain energy-saving home improvements. A few of the improvements that can’t be prohibited by HOAs (subject to certain conditions) under the law include: solar panels, rain barrels, energy efficient appliances, solar water heaters, electric vehicle supply equipment, and energy-efficient windows.

Why it Matters: The new law will take effect 90 days after the legislature adjourns. Accordingly, the effective date will likely be in early 2025.

———

  1. Fraser Trebilcock Lawyers Selected Among “The Best Lawyers in America©” 2025 Edition in Lansing

Fraser Trebilcock is proud to announce that 12 attorneys from the firm have been selected for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America© 2025 edition in Lansing. Those selected include: Michael S. Ashton, Administrative / Regulatory Law; Litigation – Regulatory Enforcement (SEC, Telecom, Energy); Utilities Law; Douglas J. Austin, Real Estate Law; Michael E. Cavanaugh, Administrative / Regulatory Law; Bet-the-Company Litigation; Commercial Litigation; Litigation – Labor and Employment; Michael P. Donnelly, Commercial Litigation; Sean P. Gallagher, Environmental Law; Litigation – Environmental; Jennifer Utter Heston, Administrative / Regulatory Law; Mark E. Kellogg, Closely Held Companies and Family Business Law; Corporate Law; Hon. Paula J. Manderfield (Ret.), Mediation; Thaddeus E. Morgan, Commercial Litigation; Litigation – Construction; Michael H. Perry, Environmental Law; Gary C. Rogers, Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights / Insolvency and Reorganization Law; Litigation – Insurance; and Marlaine C. Teahan, Trusts and Estates.

Why it Matters: “These twelve attorneys are proven leaders in their field, and practice at a very high level. We congratulate them on this recognition by  Best Lawyers®,” said Thaddeus E. Morgan, President of Fraser Trebilcock. Read more.

———

  1. Attorney Douglas J. Austin Honored as “Lawyer of the Year” in Real Estate Law in Lansing

Fraser Trebilcock attorney Douglas J. Austin has been named the Best Lawyers in America® 2025 Real Estate Law “Lawyer of the Year” in Lansing. “I am honored to be recognized by Best Lawyers® as a 2025 ‘Lawyer of the Year’ for Real Estate Law in Lansing,” said Mr. Austin.

Why it Matters: This is a high distinction, as only one attorney in each practice area in each community is identified as “Lawyer of the Year.” Mr. Austin has been at the center of real estate law for over 45 years. In addition to being a shareholder at Fraser Trebilcock, he is also the past chair of the firm’s Real Estate Law department.

———

  1. Intellectual Property and Rebranding: What Business Leaders Need to Know

Rebranding a business is exciting. It’s often done at a time of growth and transformation, such as a merger or acquisition, when a business is launching an important new product, entering a new geographic market, or trying to appeal to a new customer demographic. Whether you’re updating your logo, changing your company name, or overhauling your entire brand identity, it’s a big step that can lead to great opportunities.

Why it Matters: But before you dive into the creative process, it is crucial to consider the intellectual property (IP) law implications of a rebrand. Your brand is one of your most valuable assets, and rebranding involves important legal considerations that can impact your business’s future. In this article, we’ll walk you through some key IP issues you need to consider when rebranding. These considerations will help you protect your new identity and avoid costly legal pitfalls along the way. Read more.

———

  1. FTC Non-Compete Prohibition on Hold Again

Briefly, the FTC issued a Final Rule, scheduled to go into effect on September 4, 2024, placing limitations on non-compete and related employer contracts or policies. That rule has been reviewed by three courts. Previously, the Northern District of Texas invalidated the rule as beyond the authority of the FTC to issue, but issued an injunction barring enforcement of the rule only with respect to the parties to that litigation.

Why it Matters: U.S. District Judge Ada Brown, sitting in the Northern District Court in  Texas, has now held the rule invalid as “arbitrary and capricious.” In comparison to her first ruling, however, this court issued a national injunctive order barring enforcement of the rule in all United States federal court jurisdiction. Ryan LLC v. FTC. LINK. As a result, employers are not required to follow the Final Rule. The duration of this order and status is unknown, but can be expected to be several months or longer, or possibly permanent. Read more.

Related Practice Groups and Professionals

Energy, Utilities & Telecommunication | Sean Gallagher
Real Estate Law | Doug Austin
Intellectual Property | Andrew Martin
Labor, Employment & Civil Rights | David Houston
Business & Tax | Andrew Martin

Intellectual Property and Rebranding: What Business Leaders Need to Know

Rebranding a business is exciting. It’s often done at a time of growth and transformation, such as a merger or acquisition, when a business is launching an important new product, entering a new geographic market, or trying to appeal to a new customer demographic. Whether you’re updating your logo, changing your company name, or overhauling your entire brand identity, it’s a big step that can lead to great opportunities.

But before you dive into the creative process, it is crucial to consider the intellectual property (IP) law implications of a rebrand. Your brand is one of your most valuable assets, and rebranding involves important legal considerations that can impact your business’s future. In this article, we’ll walk you through some key IP issues you need to consider when rebranding. These considerations will help you protect your new identity and avoid costly legal pitfalls along the way.

Protecting Your Brand During Rebranding

Intellectual property laws give you the legal right to protect unique aspects of your brand, like your company name, logo, as well as your product designs. When you rebrand, you need to make sure your new brand elements are protected just like your old ones were. This means registering new trademarks, updating copyright protections, and making sure you’re not accidentally stepping on someone else’s IP toes.

Why is this so important? Well, imagine spending tens of thousands—or even millions in the case of a large company—on a rebrand, only to find out another company is already using a similar name or logo. You may have to modify your new brand to avoid confusion in the marketplace; or worse you could be sued for trademark infringement if your new brand is too similar to an existing one. These scenarios aren’t just headaches—they can be expensive setbacks that undo all your rebranding efforts. Even large, sophisticated companies make rebranding mistakes because they don’t invest enough time and resources into IP issues.

Accordingly, by paying attention to IP during your rebrand, you’re not just following the law—you’re protecting your investment and ensuring your new brand can grow and thrive without legal obstacles. Now let’s address some of the specific steps you can take to safeguard your new brand identity.

Preparing for Your Rebrand

Before you call in the creative team to start dreaming up new logos or catchy slogans, it’s crucial to lay some groundwork. This preparation phase can save you time, money, and potential legal trouble down the road.

First, conduct a brand audit. Take a close look at your current brand. What elements are working well? Which ones need a refresh? This isn’t just about aesthetics—it’s about understanding the legal protections you already have in place. Make a list of all your registered trademarks, copyrights, and other IP assets. This might include your company name, logo, product names, slogans, and even distinctive packaging designs.

Next, review your current IP assets. Are all your registrations up to date? Have you been using all the trademarks you’ve registered? If not, you might risk losing those protections. This is also a good time to think about any unregistered trademarks you might be using—elements of your brand that you’ve been using but haven’t officially registered.

While you’re at it, consider your market position and your competitors. Are there any areas where your brand might be conflicting with others in your industry? Understanding this landscape can help guide your rebranding decisions and highlight potential legal issues before they become problems.

This preparatory phase helps set the stage for a successful rebrand. By understanding what you have and what you need, you’ll be in a much better position to create a new brand identity that’s both compelling and legally sound.

Trademark Considerations

Trademarks are what legally protect your brand name, logo, and other distinctive elements of your business identity. So, as you’re developing your new brand, you need to think carefully about how you protect and enforce them.

Before you fall in love with a new name or logo, do your homework. Conduct a thorough trademark search. This isn’t just a quick Google search or a scan of your competitors’ websites. You need to check trademark databases, including the USPTO’s database for federal trademarks. Don’t forget to look for similar names or logos, not just exact matches. A name doesn’t have to be identical to cause legal problems—if it’s similar enough to confuse consumers, it could be an issue and lead to a trademark infringement lawsuit. That’s a headache you definitely want to avoid. It could force you to abandon your new brand and start over, wasting all the time and money you’ve invested.

When choosing your new brand elements, aim for something distinctive. The more unique your name, logo, or slogan is, the easier it will be to protect legally. Generic or descriptive terms are harder to trademark, while arbitrary or original words offer stronger protection.

Once you’ve settled on your new brand elements, file for trademark registration. In the U.S., trademark rights are generally based on use, but registering gives you important additional protections. It puts others on notice that you’re claiming rights to that mark, and it can be crucial if you ever need to enforce your rights. Working with experienced IP counsel and taking the time to get this right is an investment in your business’s future.

Copyright Issues in Rebranding

Copyright protects original creative works, including things like logos, promotional materials, and even the text on your website. Unlike trademarks, copyright protection is automatic as soon as you create something original. But here’s the catch: you need to make sure what you’re creating is truly original.

Many businesses look at other successful brands for inspiration, but be careful. Copying or closely mimicking someone else’s work can lead to problems. Even if it’s unintentional, copyright infringement can result in costly lawsuits. So when you’re designing new brand elements, make sure your team is creating from scratch, not just tweaking existing designs or messaging.

What if you want to use something that someone else created? Maybe you’ve found the perfect stock photo for your website homepage, or you want to use a particular font for your logo. In these cases, you need to secure the right licenses. Don’t assume that because something is available online, it’s free to use. Always check the licensing terms and, when in doubt, reach out to the copyright owner for permission (and be prepared to pay for the privilege to use someone else’s creation).

For your own new creations, consider registering the copyright. While not required, registration with the U.S. Copyright Office can provide additional benefits if you ever need to enforce your rights. It’s especially worth considering for key elements of your new brand identity.

Securing Your Online Presence

When you rebrand, you need to think beyond business cards and signage—you need to consider your digital footprint too.

Your website is often the first point of contact for potential customers, so you want to make sure your new brand name is reflected in your web domain name. As soon as you’ve settled on a new name, check if the corresponding domain name is available. And don’t just look at .com. Consider other extensions like .net, .org, or country-specific domains if they’re relevant to your business.

Next, think about social media. Your handles on platforms like X, Instagram, and Facebook are an important part of your brand identity. Ideally, you want consistent handles across all platforms. Check the availability of your new brand name on all the social media channels you plan to use. If the exact name isn’t available everywhere, try to choose variations that are as close and consistent as possible.

By registering relevant domain names and social media handles, you’re preventing others from using names that could be confused with your brand. This helps avoid customer confusion and potential trademark issues down the line.

Working with Legal Experts

While you might be tempted to handle all aspects of your rebrand in-house, when it comes to the legal side of things, it’s wise to bring in a professional early in the process. An IP lawyer can guide you through trademark searches, helping you interpret the results and assess the level of risk associated with your new brand elements. They can also assist with the trademark registration process, ensuring all paperwork is filed correctly and on time.

If your rebrand involves complex issues – like transferring existing IP rights or navigating international markets – expert legal advice becomes even more crucial. An experienced IP attorney can help you navigate these complexities and develop a strategy that protects your brand across all your target markets.

Protecting Your New Brand

After you’ve launched your brand, your work isn’t over yet. Now comes the ongoing task of protecting your new brand.

First and foremost, you need to monitor the marketplace. Keep an eye out for any businesses using names, logos, or other branding elements that are similar to yours. The earlier you catch potential infringement, the easier it is to address.

If you do spot a potential infringement, don’t rush to sue. Often, a carefully worded cease and desist letter can resolve the issue. This is where having a relationship with an IP attorney can be valuable—they can help you determine if there’s really an infringement and guide you on the appropriate action to take.

But protection isn’t just about policing others—it’s also about maintaining your own rights. For example, use your trademarks consistently and properly. If you’ve registered a logo, make sure you’re using it in the form in which it was registered. Keep records of how and when you use your trademarks in commerce.

Be proactive and make IP an important strategic consideration for your business.

Conclusion

Rebranding your business is a big step, filled with both exciting opportunities and potential challenges. As we’ve discussed, protecting your intellectual property is a crucial part of this process that shouldn’t be overlooked. With careful planning, the right protections in place, and assistance from an experienced IP lawyer, your new brand can become a powerful tool for growing your business and standing out in the marketplace.

This alert serves as a general summary and does not constitute legal guidance. Please contact us with any specific questions.


Andrew G. Martin is an experienced registered patent attorney with history working in the automotive, electrical, and agricultural industries. He regularly advises startups and small businesses on the patent and trademark prosecution process, assisting clients from start to finish. You can reach him at 517.377.0834 or at amartin@fraserlawfirm.com.

How do you defend an Amazon Neutral Patent Evaluation?

What is Amazon’s Patent Infringement Program and how does it work?

Amazon’s Neutral Patent Infringement Program (NPE) is Amazon’s version of a quasi-judicial court to resolve patent infringement disputes between sellers. It is akin to an arbitration or mediation overseen by an experienced and vetted patent practitioner. NPE is not a court of law, so any of the rulings are not prejudicial on any platform or marketplace other than Amazon.com. However, it aims to provide a more cost-effective method to resolve patent disputes between sellers.

The program is initiated once a patent holder submits a complaint to Amazon through Amazon’s seller portal. The accused product is immediately removed from its Amazon listing and the accused infringer is notified. The accused infringer then may negotiate a settlement directly with the rights holder or agree to participate in the NPE program.

A neutral evaluator is assigned to each case to determine whether a particular vendor’s goods violates the patent or patents asserted by the rights holder. Both the rights holder and the accused infringer have the opportunity to argue their cases. Each party may file a brief up to 15 pages along with a $4,000 deposit each. The winner of the process gets their $4,000 deposit refunded.

How to defend against an Amazon Patent Infringement Program claim.

A seller who choses to participate in the NPE program may defend against a claim of patent infringement by:

    • arguing noninfringement;
    • providing evidence that the patent was previously declared invalid or unenforceable by a court, USPTO or ITC; or
    • proving the products were on sale one year or more before patent’s effective filing date.

Importantly, patent invalidity is not an available defense for the accused infringer. This is one of the main differences between the federal court system and the NPE program because arguing invalidity is often a large part of a defensive strategy. Interestingly, Amazon will still consider whether the accused products were on sale one year or more before the patent’s effective filing date, which would be grounds for invalidity in the federal courts.

Most likely, an accused infringer will need to argue non-infringement. Patent infringement is a complex concept, therefore before a decision is made whether to participate in the NPE process, a non-infringement analysis should be conducted by a Registered Patent Attorney to determine the likelihood of a successful defense.

Part of a non-infringement strategy will be to argue the most narrow interpretation of the subject patent’s claims. The claims are the only part of a patent that defines the rights granted by the patent. Therefore, arguing for the most limited interpretation of the claims will yield the most limited scope of patent rights.

A patent must be construed in view of the prior art.  The claims cannot be read to cover prior art, nor can they be construed to be broader than what was considered during prosecution. While Amazon’s NPE process does not consider invalidity arguments, you can submit prior art to support arguments limiting the scope of the claims. This is a complex and technical argument that should be drafted by a Registered Patent Attorney familiar with claim construction and patent litigation. If you need assistance or have any questions, please contact Andrew G. Martin or your Fraser Trebilcock attorney.

This alert serves as a general summary and does not constitute legal guidance. Please contact us with any specific questions.


Andrew G. Martin is an experienced registered patent attorney with history working in the automotive, electrical, and agricultural industries. He regularly advises startups and small businesses on the patent and trademark prosecution process, assisting clients from start to finish. You can reach him at 517.377.0834 or at amartin@fraserlawfirm.com.

Patentable vs. Infringing: What’s the Difference?

The patent system is intended to spur innovation, incentivize inventors, and protect against infringement. One of the big challenges innovators face in this realm is understanding patentability and what constitutes infringement.

Criteria for Patentability

Patentability requires consideration of three key criteria: novelty, non-obviousness, and usefulness (or utility). The requirement of utility is a de minimus requirement and is met if any use can be had from the claimed invention. To be patentable, an invention must be novel meaning it cannot be part of the existing body of knowledge known as “prior art.” It must also be non-obvious meaning it cannot be an obvious extension of existing technologies or solutions when viewed by a person of ordinary skill in the art.

The scope of patentable material is wide, encompassing everything from new chemical compounds to software methods, and from mechanical devices to biotechnological processes. However, there are limitations. For instance, abstract ideas, natural phenomena, and artistic creations are in the public domain and are ineligible subject matter.

Patent Infringement

Patent infringement occurs when an individual or entity makes, uses, sells, or imports a patented invention without permission from the patent holder. While this may sound straightforward, it’s not; determining infringement is often a complex matter requiring detailed legal analysis.

There are several forms of infringement to be aware of:

    • Direct Infringement: The infringing product or process directly falls under the scope of the patented claims. The doctrine of equivalents is also direct infringement in which a product or process contain elements identical or equivalent to each claim element of the patented invention.
    • Indirect Infringement: Where a third party contributes to or induces others to infringe.

Distinguishing Between Patentable and Infringing

The distinction between what is patentable and what is infringing is defined by the scope of the patent claims. For instance, a new invention that improves upon a patented product may still be patentable even though the envisioned product itself may infringe on the patented claims. On the other hand, a product that is not patentable may also infringe granted patents.

Legal Consequences and Remedies

The consequences for infringing on a patent can be severe, ranging from monetary damages to injunctive relief.

    • Monetary Damages: Courts can award significant damages to the patent holder, often based on the what the court determines to be a “reasonable royalty” but may also consider profits lost due to the infringement. In cases of willful infringement, these damages can be trebled.
    • Injunctive Relief: In some cases, courts may issue an injunction to prevent further infringement. This can halt the production or sale of the infringing product, having a substantial impact on the infringer’s business.
    • Legal Costs: The cost of litigation in patent cases can be substantial, adding another layer of consequence for the infringer.

Given the stakes involved in patent infringement, it’s crucial for companies and individuals to take proactive steps to avoid it, including consulting with experienced legal counsel.

Conclusion

Understanding the difference between patentable inventions and infringing actions is critical in our innovation-driven economy. By grasping the distinctions, you can harness the power of intellectual property while avoiding the pitfalls of infringement.

If you or your business is interested in intellectual property services, such as drafting patent applications, conducting freedom to operate opinions, analyzing patentability, or determining infringement risks, contact Andrew G. Martin or your Fraser Trebilcock attorney.

This alert serves as a general summary and does not constitute legal guidance. Please contact us with any specific questions.


Andrew G. Martin is an experienced registered patent attorney with history working in the automotive, electrical, and agricultural industries. He regularly advises startups and small businesses on the patent and trademark prosecution process, assisting clients from start to finish. You can reach him at 517.377.0834 or at amartin@fraserlawfirm.com.

Legal Issues for Creating and Maintaining Your Website

The reach and impact of the internet is well known and it provides a must-have medium to advertise, promote, and conduct business. Setting up and maintaining your website may seem like a relatively straightforward process, but just under the surface lie a variety of legal issues and even potential minefields that should be taken into consideration in order to protect your business online. Continue reading Legal Issues for Creating and Maintaining Your Website