Tag: infringement

Five Stories That Matter in Michigan This Week – December 15, 2023

  1. The Effective Date of the Repeal of Michigan’s Right-to-Work Law Will be Sooner Than Expected

The Michigan legislature repealed the state’s right-to-work law earlier this year. The law provided that employees in Michigan could not be forced by union contracts to join or financially support any labor organization as a condition of employment. The effective date of the repeal was anticipated to be March 30, 2024, however it will now likely be effective on February 13, 2024.

Why it Matters: The effective date of the repeal is tied to the end of the Michigan legislature’s legislative session. Because the legislature ended its legislative session early this year, on November 14, 2023, the effective date will come sooner than anticipated.

———

  1. CRA Publishes November 2023 Data: Average Price Decreases

Per data released by the Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA), the average retail price for adult-use sales of an ounce of cannabis in October was $97.51, a very minimal decrease from $97.62 in October. For the first time, this is an increase to the average price when compared to the year prior, when in November 2022, the average price was $95.12.

Why it Matters: While the prices of cannabis and cannabis-related products continue to decrease and make consumers happy, growers on the other hand are seeing profits decrease resulting in them seeking ways to halt new licenses to be granted in an effort to steady prices. Contact our cannabis law attorneys if you have any questions.

———

  1. Qualified Michigan Residents Set to Receive Checks From EITC

It was announced earlier this week that qualified Michigan residents under the state’s expanded Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) program should start to expect to receive their checks in the mail starting February 13, 2024. It is estimated it will take up to six weeks to distribute payments.

Why it Matters: As we covered earlier this year, the Michigan legislature had passed a bill, which Governor Whitmer signed into law, expanding the state’s Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). The law retroactively increased the state’s EITC to 30% of the federal credit, where it is estimated to impact over 700,000 low-income workers. Families should receive on average $550.

———

  1. Governor Whitmer Signs Bills Permitting State and Tribal Businesses to Engage in Commerce with Each Other

The landscape of the cannabis industry in Michigan continues to evolve as new legislative efforts in Michigan aim to bridge the operational divide between state-licensed cannabis enterprises and tribal cannabis businesses. Two pivotal bills, Senate Bill 179 and Senate Bill 180, were signed by Governor Whitmer on October 19, 2023, creating a collaborative business environment for these formerly siloed entities.

Why it Matters: Prior to the legislation being enacted, state-licensed and tribal cannabis operations in Michigan functioned independently, restrained from mutual commerce and collaboration, including prohibitions on cannabis products being sold between these businesses. The new legislation allows these two distinct parts of the cannabis industry to interact.

———

  1. Patentable vs. Infringing: What’s the Difference?

The patent system is intended to spur innovation, incentivize inventors, and protect against infringement. One of the big challenges innovators face in this realm is understanding patentability and what constitutes infringement.

Why it Matters: The distinction between what is patentable and what is infringing is defined by the scope of the patent claims. For instance, a new invention that improves upon a patented product may still be patentable even though the envisioned product itself may infringe on the patented claims. On the other hand, a product that is not patentable may also infringe granted patents. Learn more from your Fraser Trebilcock attorney.

Related Practice Groups and Professionals

Labor, Employment & Civil Rights | David Houston
Cannabis Law | Sean Gallagher
Intellectual Property | Andrew Martin

Five Stories That Matter in Michigan This Week – December 8, 2023

  1. Governor Whitmer Signs Executive Order for State Vehicles to be Zero-Emission by 2040

On Tuesday, Governor Whitmer signed an executive directive mandating the state government to convert its fleet of cars and trucks to zero-emission vehicles by 2040.

Why it Matters: In a statement accompanying the directive, Governor Whitmer stated that the transition would reduce air pollution, help boost demand for Michigan-made electric vehicles, and lower fuel costs. The directive comes on the heels of Governor Whitmer signing legislation that will impose a new 100% clean energy standard for utilities to hit by 2040.

———

  1. Patentable vs. Infringing: What’s the Difference?

The patent system is intended to spur innovation, incentivize inventors, and protect against infringement. One of the big challenges innovators face in this realm is understanding patentability and what constitutes infringement.

Why it Matters: The distinction between what is patentable and what is infringing is defined by the scope of the patent claims. For instance, a new invention that improves upon a patented product may still be patentable even though the envisioned product itself may infringe on the patented claims. On the other hand, a product that is not patentable may also infringe granted patents. Learn more from your Fraser Trebilcock attorney.

———

  1. Michigan Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Minimum Wage

Earlier this week, the Michigan Supreme Court heard arguments on whether the “adopt-and-amend” actions on two ballot initiatives from 2018 that alter the state’s minimum wage and paid sick leave requirements were constitutional.

Why it Matters: The Michigan Supreme Court is anticipated to make a decision in 2024. If the Supreme Court upholds the adopt-and-amend process that the Court of Appeals deemed constitutional, then employers will operate under the current minimum wage and paid sick leave requirements. However, if the process is found unconstitutional and the Supreme Court overrules the lower court’s decision, then it would reinstate the original 2018 initiatives on minimum wage and paid sick leave requirements.

———

  1. Ohio Senate Passes Bill Altering Legal Cannabis Program

On Wednesday, the Ohio Senate voted on a proposal that would alter the state’s legal cannabis program, after voters passed Issue 2 in November, allowing the sale of recreational cannabis to adults 21 years or older.

Why it Matters: The bill now moves onto the House, and if it passes, the Governor has indicated he will sign it. Some of the proposed changes include reducing the number of homegrown plants allowed to 6 (from 12), increasing the tax on sales from 10% to 15%, allowing medicinal shops to sell to recreational users, and altering the way tax revenue would be spent, allocating funds to different programs.

———

  1. Michigan Cannabis Sales in Third Quarter Nearly $75 Million More than Second Quarter

Michigan cannabis sales totaled $827,737,257.25 in the third quarter of 2023, a nearly $75 million increase from the second quarter in which sales totaled $752,770,513.25.

Why it Matters: Marijuana sales remain strong in Michigan, particularly for recreational use. However, there still are significant concerns about profitability and market oversaturation that the industry is contending with.

Related Practice Groups and Professionals

Energy, Utilities & Telecommunication | Sean Gallagher
Intellectual Property | Andrew Martin
Labor, Employment & Civil Rights | David Houston
Cannabis Law | Sean Gallagher

Patentable vs. Infringing: What’s the Difference?

The patent system is intended to spur innovation, incentivize inventors, and protect against infringement. One of the big challenges innovators face in this realm is understanding patentability and what constitutes infringement.

Criteria for Patentability

Patentability requires consideration of three key criteria: novelty, non-obviousness, and usefulness (or utility). The requirement of utility is a de minimus requirement and is met if any use can be had from the claimed invention. To be patentable, an invention must be novel meaning it cannot be part of the existing body of knowledge known as “prior art.” It must also be non-obvious meaning it cannot be an obvious extension of existing technologies or solutions when viewed by a person of ordinary skill in the art.

The scope of patentable material is wide, encompassing everything from new chemical compounds to software methods, and from mechanical devices to biotechnological processes. However, there are limitations. For instance, abstract ideas, natural phenomena, and artistic creations are in the public domain and are ineligible subject matter.

Patent Infringement

Patent infringement occurs when an individual or entity makes, uses, sells, or imports a patented invention without permission from the patent holder. While this may sound straightforward, it’s not; determining infringement is often a complex matter requiring detailed legal analysis.

There are several forms of infringement to be aware of:

    • Direct Infringement: The infringing product or process directly falls under the scope of the patented claims. The doctrine of equivalents is also direct infringement in which a product or process contain elements identical or equivalent to each claim element of the patented invention.
    • Indirect Infringement: Where a third party contributes to or induces others to infringe.

Distinguishing Between Patentable and Infringing

The distinction between what is patentable and what is infringing is defined by the scope of the patent claims. For instance, a new invention that improves upon a patented product may still be patentable even though the envisioned product itself may infringe on the patented claims. On the other hand, a product that is not patentable may also infringe granted patents.

Legal Consequences and Remedies

The consequences for infringing on a patent can be severe, ranging from monetary damages to injunctive relief.

    • Monetary Damages: Courts can award significant damages to the patent holder, often based on the what the court determines to be a “reasonable royalty” but may also consider profits lost due to the infringement. In cases of willful infringement, these damages can be trebled.
    • Injunctive Relief: In some cases, courts may issue an injunction to prevent further infringement. This can halt the production or sale of the infringing product, having a substantial impact on the infringer’s business.
    • Legal Costs: The cost of litigation in patent cases can be substantial, adding another layer of consequence for the infringer.

Given the stakes involved in patent infringement, it’s crucial for companies and individuals to take proactive steps to avoid it, including consulting with experienced legal counsel.

Conclusion

Understanding the difference between patentable inventions and infringing actions is critical in our innovation-driven economy. By grasping the distinctions, you can harness the power of intellectual property while avoiding the pitfalls of infringement.

If you or your business is interested in intellectual property services, such as drafting patent applications, conducting freedom to operate opinions, analyzing patentability, or determining infringement risks, contact Andrew G. Martin or your Fraser Trebilcock attorney.

This alert serves as a general summary and does not constitute legal guidance. Please contact us with any specific questions.

Andrew G. Martin is an experienced registered patent attorney with history working in the automotive, electrical, and agricultural industries. He regularly advises startups and small businesses on the patent and trademark prosecution process, assisting clients from start to finish. You can reach him at 517.377.0834 or at amartin@fraserlawfirm.com.