Five Stories That Matter in Michigan This Week – November 22, 2024

  1. Detroit City Council Mulls New Regulations on Cannabis Advertising

The Detroit Free Press recently reported that the Detroit City Council is considering adopting new regulations that would restrict cannabis advertisements. Proposed restrictions include banning ads within 1,000 feet of schools, libraries, and parks, and other “sensitive” areas.

Why it Matters: The proposed ordinance is meant to shield children from such advertising. An ordinance already restricts tobacco companies from advertising 1,000 feet from schools.

———

  1. Fraser Trebilcock Named a Tier 1 Law Firm in Lansing in Six Practice Areas for 2025

Fraser Trebilcock has received a First Tier ranking in Lansing in six practice areas by U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” in 2025. Those practice areas are: Administrative/Regulatory Law, Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtor Rights/Insolvency and Reorganization Law, Commercial Litigation, Environmental Law, Litigation – Labor and Employment, and Utilities Law. In addition to the First Tier ranking in six legal practice areas, Fraser Trebilcock has been named a Tier Two firm in Lansing for four practice areas, and has also been named a Tier Three firm in Lansing for four practice areas. The Tier Two areas are: Closely Held Companies and Family Businesses Law, Litigation – Insurance, Real Estate Law, and Trusts & Estates. The Tier Three areas are: Bet-the-Company Litigation, Corporate Law, Litigation – Construction, and Litigation – Environmental.

Why it Matters: Firms included in the 2025 “Best Law Firms” list are recognized for professional excellence with persistently impressive ratings from clients and peers. Achieving a tiered ranking signals a unique combination of quality law practice and breadth of legal expertise. The 2025 rankings are based on the highest number of participating firms and the highest number of client ballots on record. Receiving a tier designation reflects the highest level of respect a firm has earned among other leading lawyers and clients in the same communities and in the same practice areas for their abilities, their professionalism and their integrity.

———

  1. Business Education Series: Referral Generation: Avoid Peaks & Valleys in Your Sales Funnel

Every business owner prefers a referral to a cold lead. Referrals have a basis of trust and understanding that makes the sales process simpler to execute and winning easier to achieve. Referrals can’t be generated intentionally however, right? On Tuesday, December 17, Ian Richardson, BBA, CSAP, MCSA, Principal Consultant, Fox & Crow Group LLC & Managing Partner, Richardson & Richardson Consulting, LLC, will discuss how this is incorrect.

Why it Matters: Learn how to structure an intentional referral generation pipeline from existing clients while minimizing the risk of client churn. Three takeaways include preparing conversations with clients, retention efforts for clients who are not ready to refer, and review of how to prepare a referral list for clients. Full information and to register.

———

  1. Michigan CRA Publishes October ’24 Data: Average Price Decreases

Per data released by the Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA), the average retail price for adult-use sale of an ounce of cannabis in October was $73.99, a decrease from $78.68 in September. This is a decrease from October 2023, where the average price was $97.62.

Why it Matters: While the prices of cannabis and cannabis-related products continue to decrease and make consumers happy, growers on the other hand are seeing profits decrease resulting in them seeking ways to halt new licenses to be granted in an effort to steady prices.

———

  1. Michigan Court of Appeals Confirms Commercial Roof Replacement Qualifies as “New Construction” for Property Tax Purposes

In a recent decision that clarifies the scope an “addition” for property tax purposes, the Court of Appeals held that installing a new roof on a commercial building constitutes “new construction” that triggers an increase in the property’s taxable value beyond the standard legislative cap.

Why it Matters: By confirming that even basic building improvements like roof replacements constitute “additions” that can trigger increased tax assessments, the ruling clarifies a power that local tax assessors have long possessed but may not have consistently exercised. Read more.

Related Practice Groups and Professionals 

Cannabis Law | Sean Gallagher
Business & Tax | Paul McCord

Uncapping of Commercial Real Estate Assessments

Most are aware that the taxable value assessment of a commercial property is uncapped on its sale, but it can also uncap in the event of certain other transfers which do not involve the sale of property and the recording of a deed.

By way of background, Michigan real property taxable value assessments are “capped” and can only increase year-to-year at the lesser of 5% or the rate of inflation. Section 211.27a(6) of the General Property Tax Act defines “transfer of ownership” generally as the conveyance of title to or a present interest in property, the value which is substantially equal to the value of the fee interest. Section 211.27a(6) provides a variety of examples of what constitutes a transfer of ownership for taxable value uncapping purposes.

Many are unaware that the sale or transfer of an ownership interest in an entity which owns real property is a transfer of ownership of the entity’s real estate for tax purposes if the ownership interest sold or transferred is more than 50% of the total ownership interest in the entity. In other words, if you sell or transfer more than half of the ownership interest in an entity owning real property, you have created a “transfer of ownership” of the entity’s real property for real estate tax purposes. This provision is applicable to stock in a corporation, membership interests in a limited liability company and percentage ownership in a partnership. Such a sale or transfer will result in the “uncapping” of the property tax assessment of all real property owned by the entity. By way of example, suppose John Doe owns a majority of the ownership interest in Universal Widget and transfers it as a gift to his son, Peter Doe. The transfer will result in the uncapping of the property tax assessment on all real property owned by Universal Widget. If the transfer occurs in increments over time, the lifting of the taxable value cap occurs at the point John Doe no longer owns the majority interest in Universal Widget.

When a majority ownership interest in an entity has been sold or transferred, a Real Estate Property Transfer Affidavit must be filed with the local assessor. Section 10 of the Affidavit states “Type of Transfer: Transfers include, but are not limited to, deeds, land contracts, transfers involving trusts or wills, certain long-term leases and business interest.” Failure to timely file the Affidavit permits the assessor to go back and increase prior tax assessments (after the transfer took place) to adjust the property tax assessment, possibly resulting in (i) an increased assessment resulting in increased property taxes, (ii) interest on the difference on the tax that was paid and the tax that should have been paid and (iii) penalties.

Any time you are contemplating a sale or transfer of an ownership interest in an entity which owns real estate you should consult with your attorney about the means and ramifications of your proposed transaction.


Fraser Trebilcock’s Real Estate team has a depth of experience in advising clients on all issues of property law, and they strive to have their clients’ interests protected. You can contact them at (517) 482-5800, or by filling out the contact form here.