Five Stories that Matter in Michigan This Week – May 27, 2022

Five Stories that Matter in Michigan This Week – May 27, 2022; Legal, Legislative, and Regulatory Insights


The Republican-led Michigan Senate and House recently passed $2.5 billion in tax cuts, with a party-line vote in the Senate and a more bipartisan vote in the House. The legislation was passed shortly after Governor Whitmer suggested sending $500 rebates to “working families” in Michigan. The proposed tax cuts would include an expansion of Michigan’s Earned Income Tax Credit from 6% to 20% in the 2022 tax year; increasing personal tax exemptions by $1,800; and reducing the personal income tax rate from 4.25% to 4% starting in 2023, among other things.

Why it Matters: The jockeying between the governor and legislature revolves around the broader debate over what to do with the billions of dollars the state has available in the form of unexpected surplus, due in large part to federal pandemic relief funding. How the money is spent, or returned to Michigan residents in the form of tax cuts or rebate checks, is sure to be a key issue in the November elections.

——–

The Michigan legislature recently voted to put the issue of term limits for lawmakers on this year’s November ballot. The plan would permit lawmakers to serve 12 years in Lansing, and all of that time could be spent in the House or Senate, or it could be divided between the two chambers. Voters will also be asked to approve or reject a requirement that state-level office holders submit annual financial disclosures to address conflicts of interest. If approved by voters, elected officials would have to disclose their assets, income and liabilities, and their involvement in any businesses, nonprofits, labor organizations or educational institutions.

Why it Matters: In 1992, Michigan voters voted in favor of a constitutional amendment for term limits. Since then, Michigan House members have been limited to three two-year terms and Michigan Senate members to two four-year terms—a maximum of 14 years between the two chambers. Accordingly, if the new term limit proposal is passed by Michigan voters, it would represent the first substantive change to term limits in 30 years.

———

The Michigan Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case with significant implications for criminal cases against nine former government officials stemming from the Flint water cases, as well as for criminal procedure, more generally, in Michigan. The criminal defendants, including former Governor Rick Snyder, argue that their constitutional rights were violated when a single grand juror indicted them.

Why it Matters: Beyond the question of whether a one-person grand jury is constitutional, this case also raises interesting separation of power issues, given that the grand juror was a sitting judge.

———

In a cash-out merger, the shareholders of the target company cash out and aren’t involved in the ongoing operations of the acquiring company. But what happens when not all the shareholders are happy about the deal? As you might suspect, litigation often ensues, and that’s exactly what happened in a case, Murphy v. Inman, recently decided by the Michigan Supreme Court. It’s an important case because the Court clarified the rights of shareholders bringing claims against directors after a cash-out merger.

Why it Matters: This decision gives shareholders, boards of directors—and their respective advisors—much needed clarity on how actions taken during corporate transactions will be viewed by the courts. First, the Court adopted a two-question test, based on reasoning from Delaware courts, to determine whether a claim should be derivative or direct. Second, it made clear that boards of directors do owe fiduciary duties directly to shareholders during a cash-out merger.

———

Three significant developments related to the production and consumption of energy happened recently. First, Governor Whitmer announced a roadmap for making Michigan carbon neutral by 2050. Second, the Attorney General’s office reached a settlement with Consumers Energy that would result in Consumers ending its use of coal by 2025. Third, Governor Whitmer petitioned the U.S. Department of Energy to keep the Palisades Nuclear Plant in southwest Michigan open, arguing that its closure would cost the state 600 well-paying jobs.

Why it Matters: Energy continues to be a major political and economic issue around the world (the war in Ukraine), in the United States (high gas prices), as well as here in Michigan. Energy inflation, together with ongoing efforts to transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy, pose ongoing challenges and opportunities for politicians, policymakers and business leaders alike.


Related Practice Groups and Professionals

Mergers & Acquisitions | Edward Castellani

Criminal | Election Law | Klint Kesto

Energy, Utilities & Telecommunication | Michael Ashton

Taxation | Mark Kellogg

MI AG Nessel Reissues Consumer Alert Following Verizon Smishing Warning

On April 1, 2022, the Michigan Attorney General reissued a consumer warning that targets Verizon phone users. The scam often works since the text message looks like it is coming from Verizon, the user’s own phone number, or another trusted number. The scam texts from Verizon thank the user for paying their bill and offers something free by clicking on a link. The link will likely download malware to your phone that may lead to identity theft. Verizon is aware of the issue and is working to prevent these scams.

For more information, read the Attorney General’s full press release here.


If you have any questions, please contact your Fraser Trebilcock attorney

Attorney Brian Morley Discusses Current Criminal Legal News on Radio Show

The recent Virginia Beach mass shooting that left 12 municipal workers deceased again brought the questions surrounding workplace shootings and disgruntled employees to national headlines.

While a guest on Michigan’s Big Show with Michael Patrick Shields earlier this week, attorney Brian P. Morley discussed the shooting and whether there are any indicators or signs to prevent such events from occurring.

To hear the full interview with Brian, click here.


Brian P. Morley | Fraser TrebilcockFor more information on this blog post, or other criminal or family law concerns, contact Lansing attorney Brian P. Morley at 517.377.0873, or bmorley@fraserlawfirm.com. Brian Morley is a skilled attorney specializing in criminal defense and family law, with the added experience of nearly a decade as a certified police officer. He was recently selected by peers for inclusion once again in The Best Lawyers in America© 2019 in the field of DUI/DWI Defense.

Attorney Brian Morley Discusses Current Criminal Legal News on Radio Show

Brian P. Morley | Fraser TrebilcockThis past weekend, six people were killed by gun violence in Kalamazoo. The alleged gunman was an Uber driver who, authorities say, has admitted to the shootings. However, the suspect is pleading not guilty in court.

While a guest on Michigan’s Big Show with Michael Patrick Shields this week, attorney Brian P. Morley was asked how an alleged criminal can say he was involved with a crime but then plead not guilty.

“The legal question will become, ‘is he criminally responsible’ for the crime, ” said Morley. “That’s why you plead not guilty at this stage.”

Morley and Shields also discussed the current television series “The People vs O.J. Simpson” and how that trial is captivating audiences now, just as it did 20 years ago.

“DNA was relatively new at the time,” Morley said. “It wasn’t as commonplace as it is now.”

To hear the full interview with Morley, on both topics, CLICK HERE.

For more information on this blog post, or other criminal or family law concerns, contact Lansing attorney Brian P. Morley at 517.377.0873, or bmorley@fraserlawfirm.com. Brian Morley is a skilled attorney specializing in criminal defense and family law, with the added experience of nearly a decade as a certified police officer. He was recently selected by peers for inclusion once again in The Best Lawyers in America© 2015 in the field of DUI/DWI Defense.

U.S. Supreme Court Rules: Police Need Warrants for Cell Phone Data

Hold the phone! Your mobile device is now off limits to police without a warrant. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Wednesday that police must have a warrant in order to search your cell phone, refuting arguments by law enforcement that a cell phone search is similar to looking in your wallet.

Continue reading U.S. Supreme Court Rules: Police Need Warrants for Cell Phone Data