- Cannabis Regulatory Agency Seeks to Update Michigan’s Marihuana Rules
The Michigan Cannabis Regulatory Agency (“CRA”) recently filed a Request for Rulemaking to begin the process of updating Michigan’s Marihuana Rules. The CRA is asking for feedback—comments or suggestions can be sent to CRA-AdminRules@michigan.gov.
Why it Matters: The proposed updates, a summary of which can be found here, would impact licensing, social equity, financial compliance, and a host of other issues.
———
- Client Alert: October 14 Deadline: Medicare Part D Notice of Creditable (or Non-Creditable) Coverage
Medicare Part D notices (of either creditable or non-creditable coverage) are due for distribution prior to October 15th.
Why it Matters: With respect to group health plans including prescription coverage offered by an employer to any Medicare Part D eligible employees (whether or not retired) or to Medicare Part D Medicare-eligible spouses or dependents, the employer must provide those individuals with a Notice of Creditable or Non-Creditable Coverage to advise them whether the drug plan’s total gross value is at least as valuable as the standard Part D coverage (i.e., creditable). Read more from your Fraser Trebilcock attorney.
———
- Michigan Cannabis Sales Exceed $274 Million in September
Cannabis sales surpassed $274 million in September, via the monthly report from the Michigan Cannabis Regulatory Agency. Michigan adult-use sales came in at $269,813,092.72, while medical sales came in at $4,915,502.78, totaling $274,728,595.50.
Why it Matters: Marijuana sales remain strong in Michigan, particularly for recreational use. However, there still are significant concerns about profitability and market oversaturation that the industry is contending with.
———
- U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Standard for Threatening Speech in Counterman V. Colorado
The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Counterman v. Colorado addressed the longstanding ambiguity surrounding the standards for criminal prosecution based on perceived threats of violence.
Why it Matters: The Court held that such a prosecution requires proof that the defendant subjectively understood the threatening nature of the statement such that making the statement was at least reckless. This case not only delves deep into First Amendment protections but also has broad implications for online communications and interactions. Read more from your Fraser Trebilcock attorney.
———
- Business Education Series – Maximizing Productivity: Strategies for More Effective Workdays
Productivity is a habit and it’s something you can become better at every day by choosing the methods and tricks that work for you.
Why it Matters: In the October Business Education Series program, Emmie Musser, Future of Work Strategist with TechSmith, is going to discuss some tried-and-true strategies for more productive and effective workdays. Learn more.
Related Practice Groups and Professionals
Cannabis Law | Sean Gallagher
Employee Benefits | Bob Burgee
Employee Benefits
Criminal Law