Intellectual Property Due Diligence in Anticipation of a Sale or Purchase of an Organization

Intellectual Property LawIs your business anticipating an upcoming merger or acquisition?  If so, you will be facing a number of upcoming due diligence responsibilities such as, but not limited to, financial stability, asset valuation, contractual obligations, employee benefits arrangements, ownership rights, licenses, and numerous other matters.  However, one incredibly important due diligence item that cannot be forgotten is that involving intellectual property (IP).

IP due diligence generally takes the form of an inventory or audit to assess the quantity and the quality of IP assets owned by, or licensed to, a company, business, or individual. The due diligence process should also include an assessment of how IP is captured, protected, and owned by the business and an analysis of relevant competitors.

Typically, the due diligence process is carried out by a prospective purchaser in relation to the IP assets of a target business.  However, IP due diligence can also be carried out by a company on its own IP assets in preparation for a transaction, such as a business sale or a major licensing deal.

Below is a non-exhaustive list of the primary activities that should carried out during the IP due diligence process. As the process unfolds, it may be necessary to drill down into one or more of the assets, especially if the asset is related to a core technology of the business.

Document retention and proactive steps as viewed from the IP owner’s perspective:

  • Identify the key personnel and consultants who are in any way involved with the IP.
  • Create and maintain a list of all of the patents and patent applications in the U.S. and any foreign country or region.
  • Create and maintain a list of all of the trademarks and trademark applications in the U.S. and any foreign country or region.
  • Create and maintain a list of all domain names and registrations of the business.
  • Create and maintain a list of all copyright registrations and applications and includes a list of copyrightable material that has not yet been registered by the U.S. Copyright Office.
  • Create and maintain a list of all contracts and agreements relating to patents, trademarks, trade names, brand names, copyrights, inventions, processes, know-how, trade secrets, or other IP, including licenses, royalty agreements, confidentiality agreements, and other agreements or arrangements to which the business is a party relating to any IP of the business or of any other entity.
  • Using proprietary protections, create and maintain a list of all legal opinions and search reports.
  • Create and maintain a list of all software products and licenses produced by or acquired by the business, other than software used for word processing and other general office functions and administration. Obtain all public domain, open source, copyright or community source code materials used, or planned to be used.
  • Summarize all products and services sold or planned to be sold by the business. Such a summary should include the dates of first commercial sale for all products and services currently being sold as well as any future commercial launch dates.
  • Identify and list any security interests taken against any of the IP.
  • Identify any pending, threatened, or past challenges to the IP or right to use its IP and/or products and/or services.
  • Identify and list the main competitors in the US and elsewhere.

Typical review and analysis steps as viewed from the IP lawyer’s perspective:

  • Review any employment or other contracts for the key personnel and consultants to determine ownership, assignment obligations and fiduciary duties. Such a review may include employment and/or consulting agreements, including any agreements with prior employer(s), as applicable. Importantly, this review should also include agreements and communications between founders to ascertain any fiduciary obligations that may impact ownership of the IP.
  • For patents and patent applications, review and analyze the scope and strength thereof to include, but not limited to, ownership, licenses, and the prosecution history of each such patent and patent application.
  • Review the material trade secrets of the business vis-à-vis the patent portfolio.
  • For trademarks and trademark applications, review and analyze the commercial usage, mark strength, coverage and status, licenses, renewal documents, and the prosecution history of each such trademark or trademark application.
  • Compare domain names to trademark list to ensure continuity and proper association.
  • Perform at least a cursory review of all copyrights and copyright registrations of the business.
  • Review all contracts and agreements relating to patents, trademarks, trade names, brand names, copyrights, inventions, processes, know-how, trade secrets, or other IP, including licenses, royalty agreements, and other agreements or arrangements to which the business is a party relating to any IP of the business or of any other entity.
  • Review all legal opinions rendered on the IP of the business, such as, but not limited to, all patentability, freedom-to-operate, infringement, validity and registrability matters conducted or commissioned by the business or by another on behalf of the business.
  • Look at any software products produced by or acquired by the business, other than software used for word processing and other general office functions and administration. Obtain all public domain, open source, copyright or community source code materials used, or planned to be used, by the business.
  • Perform at least a cursory review of all software products and licenses.
  • Perform a comparative review of products and services sold or planning to be sold with the IP portfolio and ensure that IP protection adequately precedes commercial launch dates, trade shows, and advertisement campaigns.
  • Review any security interests taken against any of the IP.
  • Analyze the scope and relevance of any pending, threatened, or past challenges to the IP of or right to use its IP and/or products and/or services.
  • Perform a cursory review of the IP owned by the main competitors in the US and elsewhere for potential monetization opportunities and to better asses the valuation of the IP assets.

These issues provide a starting point for any business that is considering a merger or acquisition in the near future and beyond. If you have specific legal questions for your business with regard to the quantity and quality of your IP, we can help. Our attorneys are experienced in all aspects of intellectual property law and business law.

This blog serves solely as a general summary of complex intellectual property issues surrounding mergers and acquisitions.  It does not constitute legal guidance. Please contact us with any questions related to your company’s intellectual property or that involving a potential upcoming business sale or purchase.

CLIENT ALERT: New Corporations Online Filing System Launches Monday, October 30, 2017 in Michigan

Business Online FilingOn Monday, October 30th, the Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) will launch a new Corporations Online Filing System (COFS) for Michigan businesses. This system  will allow businesses to submit documents and annual filings, pay filing fees, and order certificate, and will replace the MICH-ELF system. The service also features an expanded search function.

Michigan Businesses Will Be Assigned New ID Numbers for COFS

Businesses will be assigned new entity identification numbers to use when submitting documents. These numbers have been  mailed to all resident agents of Michigan business entities. It is important that resident agents save this information. It includes log-in instructions, the new entity identification number, as well as a customer identification number and PIN, which will be used as a username and password to log into new system.

It is important to note that business taxpayer identification number(s) used by the Michigan Department of Treasury and federal Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will remain unchanged.

If you have any questions, LARA has provided a detailed guide online at the Corporations Division website. Anyone needing further assistance can reach out to the Corporations Division during extended help hours, from Monday, October 30th to Thursday, November 9th from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. EST.

Learn more about the new system from LARA: New Corporations Online Filing System (COFS) Cuts Red Tape for 800,000+ Businesses in Michigan.


business-legal-checklist

Business Legal Compliance Checklist

A critical overview of laws and regulations governing businesses of all sizes.

Download the Checklist

 

NEW VIDEO: Understanding Eminent Domain Law

Our country has a rich history surrounding eminent domain – from the brick and mortar that built its foundation – to modern-day infrastructure projects like roads, airports, and bridges. Even our Founding Fathers understood the great impact this would have on private landowners as well as the condemning agencies.

“Interestingly, condemnation law was so critical that the Founding Fathers put it right in the Constitution,” said Mark Bush, eminent domain attorney at Fraser Trebilcock. “Without it, roads, bridges, highways, airports, and virtually all other aspects of the critical infrastructure we use daily would not have been possible.”

For more than 30 years, Fraser Trebilcock attorneys have successfully worked with clients to improve, protect, and defend properties of all shapes and sizes, in a broad range of projects that include: petroleum pipelines, highway construction, airport expansion, county roads, drains, water and sewer projects, and more.

“As a result of that work, I’ve actually represented both condemning agencies and landowners in a multitude of public improvement projects,” said attorney Kirby Albright. “The eminent domain area has very unique procedural requirements and any client that’s affected by the eminent domain process it’s imperative that they have knowledgeable and experienced counsel to help them navigate that procedural process.”

This video gives an interesting look back at the history of eminent domain law in the U.S. and some of the cases we have handled.



Mark A. Bush is a veteran litigator and trial specialist with over three decades of hard-earned experience handling cases ranging from condemnation to wrongful death and catastrophic injury. Contact him for more information on this matter at 517.377.0815 or mbush@fraserlawfirm.com.

H. Kirby Albright has amassed a wide range of litigation experience over the last 30 years, including successful representation of clients on both sides of eminent domain law. He has been elected by his fellow shareholders to serve on the Fraser Trebilcock Board of Directors. Contact Kirby for more information on this matter at 517.267.0538 or kalbright@fraserlawfirm.com.

CLIENT ALERT: IRS Announces Increases for Health FSAs and HSAs for 2018

Employee Benefits LawyerThe IRS has just released its 2018 annual inflation adjustments, in which it announced that the dollar limitation under Code section 125 on voluntary employee salary reductions for contribution to health flexible spending arrangements (health FSAs) is increasing to $2,650. Previously the limitation was $2,600. The authority for this increase can be found in Rev. Proc. 2017-58: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-17-58.pdf. This link takes you to the IRS annual inflation adjustments for more than 50 tax provisions. Another item to note is that the qualified transportation fringe benefit increases to $260.

Although open enrollment season is about to be in full swing for most, employers should ensure that their salary reduction agreements and related enrollment materials are updated to reflect this increase. Additionally, employers will want to review their Code section 125 cafeteria plan documents to ensure these also allow for such an increase.

Moreover, as previously advised, earlier this year in Rev. Proc. 2017-37, the IRS released the HSA limits for 2018.  Specifically, IRS Revenue Procedure 2017-37 provides the adjusted limits for contributions to a Health Savings Account (“HSA”) as determined under Section 223 of the Internal Revenue Code, as well as the high deductible health plan (“HDHP”) minimums and maximums for calendar year 2018.

The 2018 limits:

    • Annual Contribution Limit
      • Single Coverage: $3,450
      • Family Coverage: $6,900
    • HDHP-Minimum Deductible
      • Single Coverage: $1,350
      • Family Coverage: $2,700
    • HDHP Maximum Annual Out-of-Pocket Expenses (including deductibles, co-payments and other amounts, but not including premiums)
      • Single Coverage: $6,650
      • Family Coverage: $13,300
    • The catch-up contribution for eligible individuals age 55 or older by year end remains at $1,000.

Plans and related documentation, including employee communications, should be updated to reflect these new limits.

As always, please keep in mind that participation in a health FSA will result in HSA ineligibility, unless the health FSA is limited to:

  1. limited-scope dental or vision excepted benefits; and/or
  2. post-deductible expenses.

This blog serves solely as a general summary of the Medicare Part D disclosure requirements, and does not constitute legal advice. If you have questions regarding the application of this fee to your plans, contact an attorney at Fraser Trebilcock.


Elizabeth H. Latchana, Attorney Fraser TrebilcockElizabeth H. Latchana specializes in employee health and welfare benefits. Recognized for her outstanding legal work, in both 2018 and 2015, Beth was selected as “Lawyer of the Year” in Lansing for Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law by Best Lawyers, and in 2017 as one of the Top 30 “Women in the Law” by Michigan Lawyers Weekly. Contact her for more information on this reminder or other matters at 517.377.0826 or elatchana@fraserlawfirm.com.

Could Property Owners or Tenants Who Grow, Process, or Sell Marijuana Make Their Property Tough to Sell?

Michigan Marijuana Law

What Property Owners Need to Know About Title Insurance and Marijuana Facilities

Continue reading Could Property Owners or Tenants Who Grow, Process, or Sell Marijuana Make Their Property Tough to Sell?

President Trump Signs Executive Order on Health Care; HHS Announces CSR Payments to be Discontinued Immediately

President Donald Trump
Photo of President Trump’s news conference, courtesy of the White House.

Yesterday, October 12, 2017, President Trump issued an Executive Order entitled “Promoting Healthcare Choice and Competition Across the United States” (the “Order”). Also on October 12, 2017, the Department of Health and Human Services released a statement that the cost-sharing reduction payments authorized by section 1401 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“subsidies”) will be discontinued immediately (the “HHS Statement”).

Executive Order

The Order articles a “policy of the executive branch, to the extent consistent with law, to facilitate the purchase of insurance across State lines and the development and operation of a healthcare system that provides high-quality care at affordable prices for American people.” To meet this policy goal, President Trump announced that his administration will prioritize three areas of law in the new future: (1) Association Health Plans (“AHPs”); (2) Short-term, Limited-Duration Insurance (STLDI); and (3) Health Reimbursement Arrangements (“HRAs”).

To the extent consistent with law, the Order relevantly announces that government rules and guidelines should expand the availability of and access to PPACA insurance alternatives, including AHPs, STLDI, and HRAs. To effectuate this goal, the Order relevantly indicates:

“Sec. 2. Expanded Access to Association Health Plans. Within 60 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Labor shall consider proposing regulations or revising guidance, consistent with law, to expand access to health coverage by allowing more employers to form AHPs. To the extent permitted by law and supported by sound policy, the Secretary should consider expanding the conditions that satisfy the commonality of-interest requirements under current Department of Labor advisory opinions interpreting the definition of an “employer” under section 3(5) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The Secretary of Labor should also consider ways to promote AHP formation on the basis of common geography or industry.”

“Sec. 3. Expanded Availability of Short-Term, Limited Duration Insurance. Within 60 days of the date of this order, the Secretaries of the Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services shall consider proposing regulations or revising guidance, consistent with law, to expand the availability of STLDI. To the extent permitted by law and supported by sound policy, the Secretaries should consider allowing such insurance to cover longer periods and be renewed by the consumer.”

“Sec. 4. Expanded Availability and Permitted Use of Health Reimbursement Arrangements. Within 120 days of the date of this order, the Secretaries of the Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services shall consider proposing regulations or revising guidance, to the extent permitted by law and supported by sound policy, to increase the usability of HRAs, to expand employers’ ability to offer HRAs to their employees, and to allow HRAs to be used in conjunction with nongroup coverage.”

At this point is time, no changes to the law have occurred; this Executive Order merely indicates the President’s intent to make changes to the current regulatory structure in the near future. A copy of the Order is available at: www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/10/12/presidential-executive-order-promoting-healthcare-choice-and-competition

HHS Statement

The HHS Statement indicates that its decision to immediately discontinue subsidies is based on a legal opinion issued by the Attorney General. A copy of the HHS Statement and the Attorney General opinion letter are available at: www.hhs.gov/about/news/2017/10/12/trump-administration-takes-action-abide-law-constitution-discontinue-csr-payments.html

We will keep you apprised of future developments in this regard.


Elizabeth H. Latchana, Attorney Fraser TrebilcockElizabeth H. Latchana specializes in employee health and welfare benefits. Recognized for her outstanding legal work, in both 2018 and 2015, Beth was selected as “Lawyer of the Year” in Lansing for Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law by Best Lawyers, and in 2017 as one of the Top 30 “Women in the Law” by Michigan Lawyers Weekly. Contact her for more information on this reminder or other matters at 517.377.0826 or elatchana@fraserlawfirm.com.

Click HERE to sign up to receive email updates and alerts on matters related to Employee Benefits.